Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 13 Jun 2004 13:26:08 EDT |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In a message dated 6/12/2004 9:06:39 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:
> 8 % requires INVESTIGATION. This does NOT mean that anyone with a weight
> loss > 8% will require supplementation, it means we, as physicians, need to
> evaluate the mother, the baby, the milk volume and milk transfer, and follow
> the
> dyad closely. Some babies may need supplement, most won't.
>
>
Do these recommendations take into consideration vaginal vs. C-section birth?
Also, natural birth Vs interventions? Seems that excessive fluid loss in
certain births (c-sections) should be more talked up instead of just generalizing
numbers like 8-10% or 6-8% for all births. I don't know if this is happening
since I don't work in a hospital setting. When i am watching a baby at 8-10%
loss, I always want to consider the loss based on the bith experience to
determine what situations are looking more serious on day 3-4.
Also, I had polyhydraminos with my third child. Fluid loss was excessive
after. Is this considered? Heather
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|