Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 9 Nov 2003 18:24:55 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I know firsthand of a baby who was getting alternate feeds of formula
and fresh, donated milk. Sometimes her bedtime bottle was formula
and sometimes it was ebm. She behaved exactly the same, regardless
-- ate the same amount, slept the same, etc. Her parents did say she
seemed generally happier after the ebm bottles though.
It may be a fine point, but "digested more quickly" does not
necessarily mean "baby hungry sooner," does it? I would think that
even though ebm may leave the stomach faster, the perfect balance of
nutrients in ebm might satisfy the baby just as long (talking about
*bottles* of ebm vs. formula here -- certainly feeding at the breast
involves different dynamics).
Margaret
Longmont, CO
>A mother called me just this week and told me she was weaning her
>baby, because she and her husband had decided to put her baby on a
>schedule and knew that "formula takes longer to digest than breast
>milk." She also told me she did not want to give her baby any of
>the breast milk she had pumped during
>weaning because her baby might want to feed sooner than the schedule
>allowed (!!!)
<snip>
>Nancy Mohrbacher, IBCLC
>Chicago suburbs, Illinois, USA
>where we got our first sprinkling of snow unusually early and the
>weather is crisp and cold
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|