Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 14 Oct 2003 14:56:50 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In the Post-Publication Peer Review section of Pediatrics online there are
several comments on the Scheers, Rutherford, and Kemp article: "Where
Should Infants Sleep? A Comparison of Risk for Suffocation of Infants
Sleeping in Cribs, Adult Beds, and Other Sleeping Locations". Kemp replies:
> I stand by our research in the Oct. 6 issue of Pediatrics that shows babies
> who share beds with their parents are as much as 40 times more likely to
> suffocate compared to babies who sleep in cribs.
>
> It had been my hope that parents could use the hard statistical data that
> demonstrates the riskiness of bedsharing to make decisions to keep their
> babies safe.
>
> In our Western culture, adults sleep on beds that have soft pillows and plush
> bedding. While these beds are comfortable for adults, they are unsafe for
> babies. In other parts of the world, adults sleep on surfaces without soft
> covers and fluffy pillows. These sleep surfaces may be safe for babies,
> although data substantiating this are rare. The beds that most of the Western
> world sleep on are not. Parents who choose to bring their infants into their
> cushy adult beds need to know they are taking an unnecessary risk, then
> assess their actions.
>
> In addition, I know of no data that say that babies taken to bed to breast
> feed are somehow safer than those taken to bed and bottle fed. There are
> several reports of babies taken to bed solely to breast feed who have died
> suddenly and unexpectedly.
>
> Some parents might prefer to remain ignorant that sharing a bed with their
> infant can have life-threatening consequences. They characterize the idea that
> co-sleeping is hazardous as an "urban myth." They dismiss the statistics that
> show the dangers of bed-sharing as alarmist.
>
> Our research was an objective study that quantified the number of babies who
> suffocated in adult beds, compared to those who suffocated in cribs. The
> research was not designed to scare parents. Rather, the research should
> empower parents.
>
> I feel certain that the vast majority of parents would rather have
> information to do everything within their power to nurture their infants and
> demonstrate the ultimate parental bonding. The safest place for a baby to
> sleep is in a crib.
>
> James S. Kemp Associate professor of pediatrics, Saint Louis University School
> of Medicine
> Director of Sleep Disorders program, SSM Cardinal Glennon Children's Hospital
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/eletters/112/4/883
(Note, the abstract and full text of the study is also on this web page.
-- Jodine Chase
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|