Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 15 Oct 2002 11:50:40 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This is B*&ls*&t, and "speak" that means "We don't want to make mothers
feel guilty if they have not or will not breastfeed."
The data is clear on environemental toxins. This is just one of many
excuses that is not applicable, and besides the point. Formulas contain
environmental toxins.
Could be another example of sacrificing breastfeeding on the altar of
ignorance. The data is clear and there for those who are interested in
finding it. For those who are not, it's easier to give a glib and pointless
excuse.
Kathleen
At 07:24 AM 10/15/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>At two different events, Išve spoken to representatives from breast cancer
>organizations and asked why their literature doesnšt mention breastfeeding
>when discussing cancer prevention. Both of them have given me some version
>of łbreastfeeding is controversial because it contains environmental
>toxins˛. And formula doesnšt?
***********************************************
To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|