Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 21 May 2002 10:02:01 -0300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I'll let Jennifer Tow or other wise women speak to this, but, at the
> risk of generalizing, what some health-care professionals see or tests
> show as normal can still be sub-optimal, especially in combination with
> other things.
Yes; without trying to sound like an MD (which I'm not) I've heard of
people who test within "normal" (usually near the low end) but who seem
to function better, and *feel* "normal" themselves when their levels are
higher than what is considered "normal" for the general population. I
mean, isn't this "normal" level a sliding scale already (i.e. a TSH
between X and Y amounts) and it is based on the general
average...therefore most would be at Z or at W before not feeling right,
but some others could be more sensitive and be at X and feel horrible???
Just my thoughts on that..d.
Fio
ressource person with Allaitement Québec
Mama to Sandrine, 26 mos and #2, 11/2002
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|