Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 18 May 2002 21:50:23 -0300 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> She has had a complete Thyroid panel and was told everything was "normal."
> I am STILL thinking thyroid, though! She is not my first client who had
> "normal" thyroid tests only to test low later. Her doctor is willing to
> test her again in a month.
>
>
I'll let Jennifer Tow or other wise women speak to this, but, at the
risk of generalizing, what some health-care professionals see or tests
show as normal can still be sub-optimal, especially in combination with
other things. A suck can be in the normal range but a little weak... no
problem if the milk supply is generous, definitely less-than-optimal if
the breasts are slower to keep up and the baby sleepy. That's when
things become pieces of a puzzle, and when we see that how the mind is
looking at the past and the future is just as important as how the
nipple fits in the mouth.
Jo-Anne
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|