Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 3 Apr 2002 14:26:56 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
My 'personal' slant is that "at LEAST a year" implies this is the absolute
minimum the baby should be breastfed and it should be longer. "A year or
more" doesn't have the same impact.
Michelle Bentley, CLE
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diane" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 5:04 PM
Subject: up to, at least, or a year or more
> I've been wondering: doesn't "a year or more" mean the same thing as "at
> least a year"? The actual wording is "It is recommended that
breastfeeding
> continue for at least 12 months, and thereafter for as long as mutually
> desired."
> If we paraphrase it as "a year or more", doesn't that put a stronger
> emphasis on the beyond-a-year part and perhaps make it less open to
> misinterpretation?
> Diane Wiessinger
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|