Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 12 Mar 2002 08:44:07 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> << I am just wondering about comparative experiences with these in terms of
> long-term supplementation >>
>
> I did not see any responses to this, but maybe I missed them. Due to
> accessability, most of my clients use the SNS. But,i have a friend who bf her
> adopted baby, so used a supplementer for a long time. She started with the
> SNS, but in her opinion, his suckle became much stronger when she switched to
> the Lact-Aid.
I think that would make sense, given what a friend said about these
products. Said that the tube for the Lact-aid is much finer, so of
course the baby would have to suckle harder to get the milk.
She also said that the Lact-aid is much simpler to use, and leaks less
once you know how to use them. She wears her lact-aid on a modified
strap under her arm, so that there is more gravity working against the
baby's suck to make him work even harder. ;-)
Fio
ressource person with Allaitement Québec
Mama to Sandrine, 24 mos
and
#2, 11/2002
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|