Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 31 Mar 2002 00:05:03 +0000 |
In-Reply-To: |
<000f01c1d821$697e74a0$f21e9ed9@sachs-davis> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>
>Heather, if this is the Camden case you are thinking of, these details are
>incorrect. (It might not be this case, of course, and if not, I would be
>interested in knowing more.) In the Camden Case the only order the court
>made was for hiv testing on the little girl -- what they might have done
>about breastfeeding or antiretrovirals if the test had been negative or
>positive remains speculative. The parents fled in order to avoid having
>their daughter tested.
I think you're right to correct me, Magda....I was remembering off
the top of my head....: (
There was a certain implication that the mother should not be
'allowed' to bf, even so, if I recall correctly.
HWN, UK
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|