Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 20 Aug 2001 06:48:33 EDT |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
In einer eMail vom 20-8-01 12:17:06 West-Europa (zomertijd) schreibt
[log in to unmask]:
> Jennifer Tow has posted that "stastically homebirth is safer". Safer than
> what?? When mortality statistics are brought into the question, homebirth
> can bring with it a significantly increased risk (in Australia at least).
>
In The Netherlands homebirthing is still practiced as normal (60% initially
intending at conception, 30% actually homebirthing after close prenatal
screening by mostly private practicing and independant midwifes) and the
morbidity and mortality rates do not differ in a negative way to those in
other western countries and outcomes are in the higher ranks, I think only
Scandinavian countries are better.
One must ofcourse keep in mind that not only the place of birth but also the
quality of pre- and postnatal care has to be of the highest standards, which
definitely does not mean to be of the highest technical possibilities.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Gonneke van Veldhuizen, IBCLC
MOM, LLLL, primary schoolteacher
Hiilensberg, Germany
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|