Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Feb 2001 15:07:20 EST |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I hear you, Jean.
The thing is that because "raises the risks of" is, indeed, tried and true
medicalese, I think lots of people just don't hear it -- don't absorb it.
"more likely to have asthma, etc" strikes in the gut precisely because it's
comprehensible -- it's language that the hearer really can take on board.
In general, I am temperamentally and professionally inclined to stick with
plain English. If I didn't want them to be hearing it I could just save my
breath, right?
I guess my spot to draw the line of not being so brutal to the vulnerable new
parents is that I wouldn't usually include "more likely to have some
childhood cancers" in that list, even though I think it's true, just because
I think it's too big and heavy a stick to beat them with at that stage.
But I will chew further on your suggestion -- insufficient compassion being
not only intrinsically a bad thing, but also lousy for future bf rates...
Elisheva
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|