LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Margaret G. Bickmore" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:59:35 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
I just find it utterly ludicrous that Nestle claims to "abide by the
aim of the Code . . ."

WHAAAT?  Have they *read* the Code???  There's a little more to it
than just including in fine print that breast is best.

Shaking my head,
Margaret
LLLL in Longmont, CO


>
>Date:    Mon, 19 Mar 2001 20:31:40 -0500
>From:    Katherine Dettwyler <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: NBC, Nestle's, WHO Code
>
>Nestle's writes:
>
>"Although the United States is not a signatory to the WHO Code, Nestl=E9
>abides by the aim of the Code and their advertising states that breast =
>milk is best."
>
>I thought the US WAS a signatory to the WHO Code.  And while Nestle's
>advertising says that breast milk is best, they say that Carnation formula
>is the *very* best.
>
>Kathy Dettwyler
>

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2