LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:22:18 -0500
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From:
Jim & Winnie Mading <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
To: Jay Gordon <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Again I am behind, so sorry if this has already been said.

IMHO yes, urine output is the best measurement of hydration, but it
doesn't show if there is sufficient CALORIE intake.  It's the old
foremilk/hindmilk thing.  If baby is getting lots of foremilk, but
insufficient hindmilk, then there would probably be "plenty" of
voids, but short on the stools.  In talking with new parents about
output as an indicator of sufficient intake, I usually simplify it
to: "In the first weks, wet diapers tell us if baby is getting
enough volume while dirty diapers tell us if baby is getting enough
calories."  I know that may be over simplified, but I think it gives
enough for the average new parent to comprehend.

Winnie RNC, IBCLC

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2