Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 24 Apr 2001 06:21:45 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Very moving, but is it a true statement ? I'd love to see the
evidenced-based studies that support this emotional statement. Logically I
don't see where it would be different from cow's milk. Inquiring minds
want to know. Anyone have any valid info? Sincerely, Pat in SNJ
> And of all human food [in US and Canada], human breast milk is the most
contaminated with dioxin than any food you could >possibly choose to talk
about. And that's because it's one rung up on the food chain higher than
the foods that we adults eat. >Dioxin concentrates as it moves up the food
chain so it's distilled one more step in my body before it goes into my
breast. So my >breast milk is ten to a hundred times more contaminated with
dioxin than is cow's milk, cheese, meat, eggs, fish,etc. which would >be
the next highest contaminated group of foods, those made from animal flesh.
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|