Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:28:47 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> I totally agree with Kathy Dettwyler about the fact that the Mothering
> Magazine is not a research-based journal. And, it is for that reason that I
> think it can indeed meet the needs of some of the community.
I guess my thoughts are that probably the other parenting magazines are
not research based journals anymore than Mothering. Especially if some
of them show any link to formula (ads for formula companies, etc.),
there is always a possibility that some of their articles could be
biased towards the formula aspect of things. There are several in the
US...is it Parents or Parenting? and Child? Here in Canada we get
Today's Parent...and while it has some great articles in it, I would not
call it the "Scientific American" of parenting magazines. ;-) If you
can understand what I mean by that...
Fio.
ressource person for Allaitement Québec
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|