Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 20 Nov 2000 20:20:33 EST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dianne asks,
> Our nurses get quite nervous if an infant =
> hasn't nursed 2 hours after being born. Our policy sates that if an =
> infant hasn't nursed in 5 hours (after the initial feeding) a blood =
> sugar has to be done, if it is over 40 you can wait another hour, but if =
> the infant hasn't eaten in an hour, then formula is given.
> For those who have more relaxed policies, on what studies are these =
> based? Somehow in the world of evidence based research, normal newborn =
> sleepy behavior isn't enough to convince the "powers that be" to wait it =
> out before a baby has to be artificially fed.
>
Since I don't work in a hospital, I won't respond to your question, but
Dianne, I'm curious -- on what studies are your hospital policies based?
Especially the one about the baby has to eat at least 2 hours after birth?
Jan Barger in cold & snowy Wheaton
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|