Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 13:13:17 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi, folks. I personally do not have lots of experience with colic, but as I
read these last posts by R. Coats, the thought came to my mind that there IS
a major difference between breastfed babies with colic and AIM-fed babies
with colic.
This difference lay in the management of this condition and the ability to
solve it. To clarify, we all know that b/fing is extremely comforting and
allows a nursing mom the opportunity to soothe a crying infant, and to bond
with her high-need child; but also, b/fing a colicy baby offers the mother
and her healthcare providers a wonderful opportunity to actually do the
detective work required in order to try and discover what may be causing the
colic. It seems to me that AIM-feeding is all a bunch of guess work b/c one
doesn't really know exactly what is in any given formula and/or what baby
may be reacting to - switching formula is nothing more than a stab in the
dark. But b/fing along with mother's instinct, observation of her baby,
elimiation diets, family history, etc. seem to offer a much better framework
with which to relieve an infant's colic.
Just some thoughts.
Karyn-grace
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|