LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Katie Allison Granju <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 23 Jan 2001 15:57:14 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
In a message dated 1/23/2001 3:46:25 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:


> Magda,
> But what does this mean about those associated w/ pump companies? The bottom
> line is that the pump has greatly influenced the duration of bf in this
> country. Is that not relevant? And it certainly wouldn't be in the best
> interest of a pump company to educate mothers about LAM, ecological bf, etc.
>


Breastpumps are far removed from infant formula. Breastfeeding is the market
competitor to infant formula, ergo formula companies can never actually
promote breastfeeding.

Without breastfeeding, breast pump companies would go out of business. Breast
pump companies WANT women to give their babies breastmilk.

Katie

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2