Sender: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jan 2001 18:13:51 +0800 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
From: |
|
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Interesting question. My 'gut' would be to wait until the baby is healthy
enough for discharge for a couple of reasons.
Because rubella is a live vaccine, then mum can technically be infectious -
which is why we have always taught mums not to fall pregnant for 3 months. I
can't imagine that a preterm baby contracting rubella would be a good thing.
Also, it's not just her baby to consider - is there a possible risk of
spread to other babies in a NICU ? I know in a perfect world of good
handwashing this shouldn't happen......but......
Also, in the hospital I work in there are lots of antenatal patients
wandering around. The thought of someone who has had a live rubella vaccine
being in close contact with possibly non -immune antenates bothers me.
I'm probably erring very much on the side of caution here, but unless the
mum is planning on another pregnancy very soon ( and , yes, I know they are
not all 'planned') I would think it would be prudent to delay the
vaccination until baby was discharged.
JHMO
Kirsten Blacker
RN RM
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|