Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 24 Nov 2000 20:48:28 -0800 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>>I've met only one mom who is into Dr. Sears and the attachment parenting
philosophies vs. scheduling. <<
I just want to say that I do not believe attachment parenting precludes the
use of a reasonable, flexible schedule when dealing with multiples. AP is
not the opposite of control-oriented scheduling, but rather is meant to be
an intuitive style that recognizes the needs of infants as well as parents,
a sensitivity that our society often lacks.
In Bill Sear's new breastfeeding book, he comments, "While the typical cue-
(or demand-) feeding approach could be too tiring for mothers of twins, the
babies may not thrive on a rigid schedule. Somewhere in between is a feeding
routine that will work for your family, one that meets the needs of the
babies and lets the parents get enough rest." (p209)
There seems to be a common misnomer that AP is almost synonymous with
parental self-neglect, but it is not.
~Lisa Marasco IBCLC
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|