I too would like to throw my .02 in on this topic.
This was discussed a few months back and I remember Jack's comments on
watching the baby and possibly missing opportunities.  The other part I took
from his past post was that the traditional regiment of starting solids came
from the days when solids were introduced at 3 weeks of life.
What I tell parents about starting solids is first watch for cues from their
baby that he/she is ready by showing interest at the food they are eating.
This will not be before 4 months and probably after 6.  Babies are imitators
and want to join in, allow them to do this.  I suggest mashing up the food at
the table, within reason, and they do not need to start with cereal and then
fruit, ect.  I point out to the parents anything besides breast milk at this
time is complementary foods and mom should always nurse first, therefore not
compromising this intake for the solids.  Next I tell them this is a learning
period for the baby to experience and learn about the use of their mouth for
different textures and chewing, utensils, ect.  I think this is an important
time to learn and if not given the opportunity when they are ready may delay
them later.
Now I am not saying that solids should be a bigger part of their diet than
breast milk.  In the second year of their life the solids are to contribute
more to their calories.
I also think this baby food industry is a big lobby to keep parents thinking
this is the only food to give their babies.
Now off my soap box but I love this.
Ann Perry RN IBCLC
Boston, MA

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html