Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:38:13 EST |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Marsha wrote, presumably half-facetiously,
<< I often wonder how long the earth would have continued to be populated if
5% of its infants each year were unable to receive enough milk starting when
humans
first appeared! >>
Considering how much of human history the infant mortality rate was above 5%,
I'd have to say that the earth's human population would get along just fine,
in terms of self replacement; it would just be sadder than it is now.
The problem with that 5% number as I see it is not that it is impossible but
merely that it seems to be wrong, or at least unfounded. Since it undermines
confidence, a wrong or unfounded # is an especially meretricious argument --
but that has nothing to do with human continuity...
Elisheva Urbas
NYC
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|