Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 6 Aug 2000 15:54:22 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Norma -- so we should really be writing to the editor and the author, I
guess!!! ;-) Is anyone working on a sheet, maybe using Miriam Labbok's
easy to understand article in LLL Abstracts, which we could all send to all
the journals when we see stuff like this? Anyone at a loose end this
summer!!!?
Magda
>Magda, I agree - and until we have universal standards for *exclusive
>breastfeeding*
>this kind of research will continued to be flawed.
>
>>21% were exclusively breastfed for four months? this sounds like the
>>figure
>>the UK govt claim, but the definition of exclusive breastfeeding is
>>exclusive of other *milks*. Wanna bet this is the same and that those
>>babies got water and who knows what all? I am not saying they shouldn't
>>be in the study, but I think we should demand good definitions.
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|