>In a message dated 96-05-13 16:12:31 EDT, [log in to unmask] (David Eyre) >writes: > >>I think it might have been easier to give an address in Europe, as that's >>where the message came from, and with a statement that he didn't want to cut >>comb. I did in fact send him that information privately. My reason for doing >>this? We are forgetting the basic ettiquette and not stopping to think >>before we hit the send button!! >> PLEASE read headings and the address both incoming and outgoing, it >>might help to reduce the general background babble! >> Best Regards to all, keep the faith. > > > Well, I didn't know any suppliers in Europe, but did give the ones I >knew. I'm sure Dadant and Kelly are willing to ship anywhere. If there are >suppliers in Europe, then someone who knows them may well supply them. I have >no problem with that. > > So excuuuse me! I did, in fact, answer his basic question, before >suggesting a low tech (cheap) alternative that he may not have known about. > Don't you think others might also be interested in this? I like the >glitz and glamour of high tech stuff, but I survive as a beekeeper by keeping >costs down. > >[log in to unmask] Dave and Janice Green, PO Box 1200, Hemingway, SC >29554 > >Practical Pollination Home Page >http://users.aol.com/pollinator/polpage1.html Some times the simpliest way is the best! I use what they call the KISS system. (And I am talking to myself when I use it). KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID. Low tech or high tech. I have been in beekeeping since 1979 and what ever works I use. If something works for someone else at least give it a try. If it doesn't work, nothing lost. Ivan