http://blogs.sciencemag.org/pipeline/archives/2017/08/09/thoughts-on-reproducibility-2 This is a website I read daily. It is medical but often has great general discussions. This is a good read on reproducibility of experimental results. The comments expand on the main article and touch on things like statistics and personal bias. I found the most interesting point was the bottom and top journals are the ones most likely to have reproducibility issues. Obviously for different reasons. But it does give pause in taking any study at face value until it can be reproduced. Even from Journals like Science. Bill Truesdell Bath, Maine *********************************************** The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to: http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html