BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 08:01:02 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>
> >When I've done it I've gone back on the fourth day  and broken down sealed
> cells to prevent this. There are usually some.


I'm no queen producer, but I have raised about a thousand queens a year for
many years.  I have the same observation as Robert--that bees will indeed
raise queens from some older larvae.  And some sealed cells are quite small,
with small pupae.

We see this when we go through our 4-frame mating nucs.  If the cell didn't
take, and the bees raised emergency queens, some of those queens appear to
be small to the eye (I haven't weighed them).

I am speaking here of nucs with two frames of brood, so there may well be
limited choice of larvae for the bees to choose from.

This (poorer queens from walkaways) would not be a difficult hypothesis to
test.  Has anyone seen any actual data from a trial?

Randy Oliver

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2