Re. Apis Article/ David Eyre / HBTM-Resistant Stock
 
    David Eyre commented on the fact that his original discussion about HBTM
    resistant beestock raised in Ontario came over "like a lead balloon",
    while beekeepers are all so eager to adopt chemical control procedures.
 
    I suppose you are correct on both counts but I think it is important to
    recognize the importance of both issues.  Here in British Columbia, we
    have developed several HBTM-Resistant Bee Lines after a multi-year
    breeding program in partnership with the industry.  At the same time, we
    have also supported and carried out a wide-range of trials on improved
    chemical mite controls and application techniques.   We have always
    believed that these seperate mite control approaches are not exclusive
    from each other.  Ultimately, the industry's success in controlling
    mites (both HBTM and varroa) is through Integrated Pest Management
    (IPM): not one single control is sufficient, but the timely application
    of a range of controls and management techniques that offer effective
    pest control while minimizing the impact on the host.
 
    HBTM-resistant beestock may therefore be only one component of an entire
    mite control strategy.  Similarly, chemical controls occupy only one
    part of the overall mite control effort.  I don't think most beekeepers
    are inclined to favor chemical controls over mite-resistant beestock,
    but the concerns about residues, efficacy, applicators safety, product
    registration and all other factors associated with the use of chemicals,
    make this inevitably a more frequently discussed subject matter.
 
    Paul van Westendorp                         [log in to unmask]
    Provincial Apiarist
    British Columbia