BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:28:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
On the subject of New World beeswax:

>Tribute lists for 1549 show that out of 173 towns and villages
>paying tribute to the Spanish, 163 paid in wax and 157 in honey. The
>Maya valued beeswax very much less than honey. On the other hand the
>Spanish needed much wax for candles. The 1549 tributes included
>about 3 tonnes of honey and *277 tonnes* of wax.
>
>Wax from stingless bees was of lower quality that honey bee wax for
>making candles. Nevertheless during the mid 1600s it was one of the
>most important exports from Yucatan, ranking with salt, cotton
>cloth, indigo and hides. The wax - known as "cera de Campeche" - was
>the best beeswax produced in the New World until honey bees were
>introduced.

from "The World History of Beekeeping and Honey Hunting", by Eva Crane, 1999

--
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2