BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Hesbach <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Oct 2017 12:28:38 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
>Vandenberg AFB removed apiary locations after discovery of the federal endangered El Segundo Blue Butterfly on that base.  The El Segundo Blue has a host plant relationship with coastal buckwheat and nectar feeding during its brief flight period.

>I am familiar with several National Park Service properties where a quiet policy of extermination of feral honeybee nests is conducted (with the "protecting native pollinators" rationale). 

As was touched on earlier, the issue is the assumption that when we use a term we have a unified understanding of its use and that’s probably never the case.  I assume that most reading John's post would not consider EHBs as invasive.  But in this case, EHBs have been deemed harmful which would fit the broadly accepted definition- not native and cause harm. The harm part, or more importantly the degree of harm, is where categorizing an animal as invasive goes off the rails and gives rise to a continuum that allows for almost any definition and therefore any kind of action including, as with this case, misguided eradication.  


Bill Hesbach
Cheshire CT

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2