BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Cryberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 22 Oct 2015 05:26:36 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
" So to all intents and purposes, in "field relevant conditions" (not a test tube, not what Casida does) it is IRREVERSIBLE BINDING."

It makes zero difference if there is anything else present to compete for the binding site.  To be irreversible binding MUST be via covalent bonds, which would be highly unusual.  There is no way to get the dissociation activation energy barrier high enough other than covalent bonds.  Any binding via bonds with significant ionic character WILL be reversible for the simple reason that thermodynamics demands it to be reversible.  Living organisms can not avoid the laws of thermodynamics.  Why does a neonic form covalent binding bonds when nicotine itself forms ionic binding bonds if the claim of irreversible binding  of neonics is correct?

Dick

" Any discovery made by the human mind can be explained in its essentials to the curious learner."  Professor Benjamin Schumacher talking about teaching quantum mechanics to non scientists.   "For every complex problem there is a solution which is simple, neat and wrong."  H. L. Mencken

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2