BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Oct 2015 08:16:22 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
I am not in the least discounting that there are indeed adverse effects
from sublethal exposure to neonics.

What I'm unclear on is the compensatory mechanism that the bee neurons use
to deal with neonic binding.  The binding "blocks" the sodium gates open,
if not irreversibly, for at least some extended period of time.  Such
sticking of those sodium gates would help to create the formation of action
potentials.

In order to compensate for those open gates, the bee's brain would be
expected to cause those receptor gates to atrophy or something.  Such
compensatory mechanisms could conceivably have a lasting effect long after
the neonic was gone (as with human brains after childhood exposure to
certain chemicals).

I suspect that this is where we should turn our focus.  I, as many others
on the List, have only rudimentary understanding of neurology, so
Christina, could you please help us here?  Do you know how the bee synapses
compensate for the neonic-induced flooding via the sodium channels?

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2