BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Oct 2015 19:00:34 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Point 2:

"If the "cumulative effect" hypothesis is true, then bees consuming neonic-tainted food for their entire lives should simply not survive for long, or exhibit clear adverse effects."

But if there is some ongoing metabolic breakdown, as there must be since we know that some of the metabolites do escape the synapse, and you yourself point the decay rate out there in Suchail's paper.... then the effect remains sublethal and they just die sooner, not quicker....meaning their lives are shortened but not in the measured amount of time.

Christina


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2