BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Lou Daveri <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Jun 2013 22:01:59 +0930
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Is anyone else on the List even following this?
> 
> Avidly. 
>  
> Can't contribute, but very much following  along. 
>  
> regards
> Deanna Corbett
> Hawke's Bay
> New Zealand

Ditto from Bugga-Bugga Creek Apiary. I really do appreciate that those with the ability and facility to close-read scientific (reputed and reputable) papers, who dissect and comment on results, and do so via this medium. It's like being in a permanent tutorial. I occasionally have a Big Yawn and a Mass Delete, and may pick up the thread several days later. For what it's worth, my Brown Stone Stats and Epi courses were based on study groups of 30 as a basis of statistical validity, and I tend to disregard studies of less than 30, as lacking statistical validity, and don't take much note of them, but I scan-read them and mentally file them as anecdotal. Every little bit helps.

So do keep on, Randy and Christina and the rest of the scientifically-minded contributors. After all, is this the essential point of BEE-L?


Certainly lurking, but literate.
LIDA BBC Apiary
Kangaroo Island.
             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2