BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kerry Clark 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Jun 1995 14:22:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (99 lines)
   I'd like us to discuss a concise, broadly applicable strategy to live
   with parasitic mites of honey bees. There is a lot of information
   available, and we're a lot better equipped now than a few years ago, but
   still there appears to be a lack of consensus about basic things such as
   treatment or damage thresholds, or spring cf. fall treatment.
 
   Although there are glimmers of hope for a symbiotic relationship between
   bees and varroa, they seem uncomfortably far in the future, considering
   the likely loss of relatively good chemical controls, and the risk of
   honey contamination from other, relatively bad chemical controls.
 
   It would be good to have a model for sustainable management (one with a
   low likelihood of failing within a few years). Below is an attempt that
   I offer for discussion. It's based on some experimental results, some
   basic principles of pest management, and some choices (for lack of
   anything better). It has not been demonstrated to work. The control
   products are those available for commercial operations in Canada and in
   some European countries (Bayvarol can be substituted for Apistan as far
   as the strategy goes, I think). I've omitted drone brood removal, heat
   treatment and lactic acid as too labour intensive, fragrant oils as
   unsubstantiated ? and other chemicals such as amitraz as undesirable for
   various reasons, although I'd like to hear from anyone who feels another
   product is justifiable for general use. An equivalent "high labour"
   version of a strategy would be easier, since more options are available.
 
   I'd appreciate hearing from those of you with varroa experience, with
   comments on how you think specific parts of the strategy compare to what
   is the current practice in your area (including the probability of
   development of resistant varroa). Options, new ideas, criticism welcome.
 
   Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
   B.C. Ministry of Agriculture
   1201 103 Ave
   Dawson Creek B.C.
        V1G 4J2  CANADA          Tel (604) 784-2225     fax (604) 784-2299
   INTERNET [log in to unmask]
 
                                FOR DISCUSSION
         Strategy for sustainable, integrated management of bee mites
 
   Assumptions: varroa and tracheal mites are established in an area.
                tolerable tracheal mite infestation:
                         15 % of bees in an apiary sample in fall.
                tolerable varroa infestation: 100/colony spring (=15/d1Api)
                 (15 varroa on a sticky board on day 1 of Apistan exposure)
                                             1000/colony fall (= 150/d1Api)
                varroa will increase as modeled in Fries '94.
                         colonies must be treated to survive.
                        adequate treatment: 90 % reduction,
                              (once per year when reinfestation is minor,
                              twice per year when reinfestation is major)
 
                commercial beekeeping (cost, labour minimized)
 
   General Advice: non-chemical strategies against tracheal mites: consider
   mite resistant stock, installation of vegetable oil patties (March
   through June), increased requeening and hive splitting with removal of
   splits after a few days flight. Check varroa drop (5 to 10 hives/
   apiary) on first day of each treatment (as below). When tolerable mite
   populations are exceeded, continue treatments. Coordinate regionally:
   mite checks, treatment material and timing. Monitor efficacy.
 
   Short-treatment option (reduces treatment to fit lower varroa levels):
   Based on mite fall on first day of treatment, reduce treatment A or B:
   Less than 100 v mites:       Apistan, leave only 2 weeks.
                                Formic, apply 120 ml/ 3 doses.
   100 to 500 v:        Apistan, leave 4 weeks.
                        Formic, apply 160 ml/ 4 doses.
   Over 500 v mites:            Apistan, leave 6 weeks.
                                Formic, apply 200 ml/ 5 doses.
 
   1. Short winter region: (bees forage early March through October)
 
        For 1 treatment/year,   alternate years, one of A, one of B.
        For 2 treatments/year,  use one A and one B per year.
 
   Spring A:  2 Apistan hive strips, installed Feb. 1 through March 10,
   Fall A:    2 Apistan hive strips, installed Sept 1 through Oct 10
 
   Spring B: 200 ml formic acid, dispensed continuously or in 5 doses,
                                    over 3 weeks in March,
   Fall B:   200 ml formic acid, dispensed continuously or in 5 doses,
                                    over 3 weeks in September,
 
   2. Long winter region: (bees forage mid April through August)
 
        For 1 treatment/year,   alternate years, one of A, one of B.
        For 2 treatments/year,  use one A and one B per year.
 
   Spring A:  2 Apistan hive strips, installed April 1 through May 10,
   Fall A:    2 Apistan hive strips, installed Sept 1 through Oct 10
 
   Spring B: 200 ml formic acid, dispensed continuously or in 5 doses,
                                    over 3 weeks in May,
   Fall B:   200 ml formic acid, dispensed continuously or in 5 doses,
                                    over 3 weeks in September.
   Thanks
   KC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2