BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 15 Oct 2015 10:16:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
U Sussex in the UK found that the pollen of wildflowers (hogweed and
poppies) within 3 to six feet of canola plantings had neonicotinoid
concentrations up to 86 ppb. The max pesticide residue in the pollen of the
crop itself was 11.1 ppb.



Pondering this and the only thing that makes a lick of sense is its total
nonsense.  Runoff or overspray would not even make this possible. The only
possible way to simulate that that I could see is by sampling a turnaround
area for a foliage sprayer.

While I can see elevated levels in surrounding plants,  I see no way it
couold exceed in this case by a factor of 8,  the level that was directly
applied.
Can you explain how this would even be remotely possible?



They other comment in this note that was eluding to farmers plowing
everything,  I can't speak for Eroupe,  but her in the USA the acerage in
row crops has been on a slow steady decline for the last 30 years or better.
Some will point to the increase in corn a cpl years back,  but neglect to
show the declines in beans and cotton.  

Charles 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2