BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
littlewolfbees apis mellifera <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Oct 2017 19:53:15 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
You seem to question the results in the years subsequent to 2010.
Have you questioned the 2010 results??

Also you make no mention as you did in the past that packages were finally
allowed by the Gov't of Newfoundland into Newfoundland
Were they screened for all the above other than just varroa/shb?  After
all, DWV is directly related to varroa and it is known that it will
continue
to mutate even if varroa has been removed.
Cross contamination?
I do recall and probably have on record contacting you off list and
pointing out the possibility of Newfoundland bees being so to speak
contaminated as a result of the packages.
You did not reply.

Walter
littlewolfapiaries.com

On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:23 AM, Peter Armitage <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> We have some fairly recent pathogen test results here in Newfoundland and
> Labrador that I would like to discuss with participants in this LIST-SERV.
> You will remember that we remain Varroa-naïve, at least for the time-being.
>
>
> Anyone care to offer an explanation or interpretation of our test results
> for DWV?
>
>
>

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2