BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 26 Mar 1998 08:28:42 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In a message dated 98-03-26 08:01:41 EST, you write:
 
<< his is also covered somewhere in the second chapter (I believe, but if
 it's wrong I'm sure someone will point that out) of Laidlaw's
 _Contemporary_Queen_Rearing_.  But the claim of more ovarioles assuring
 superior queens was left in doubt.
  >>
 
I notice in the current queen rearing discussion, that everyone keeps refering
to Laidlaw's Contemporary Queen Rearing.  I believe that book is about twenty
years old.  I just bought a copy of his new book.  I provides much more
information about the new research on the science of queen rearing and also
addresses new issues like selecting for mite resistance.  I think that
everyone who intends to drag unsuspecting larvae out of their cells to make
them into queens should give Laidlaw's new book a serious read.
 
IMHO
 
Randy Lynn, NC, USA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2