BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adam Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:37:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> >  sure would be nice to have some before and after data with real
> benchmarks instead of hyperbole.
>
>
While I would certainly acknowledge that there has been significant
hyperbole when it comes to the pollinator/neonic debate (on both sides),  I
don't think the same applies to aquatic insects which aren't nearly as
popular with the public or media.

"Our analysis revealed that 81% (22/27) and 74% (14/19) of global surface
water studies reporting maximum and average individual neonicotinoid
concentrations respectively, exceeded these thresholds of 0.2 and
0.035μg/L. Therefore, it appears that environmentally relevant
concentrations of neonicotinoids in surface waters worldwide are well
within the range where both short- and long-term impacts on aquatic
invertebrate species are possible over broad spatial scales."

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25454246

Adam
Barrie, ON

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2