BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stan Sandler <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 8 Jul 2013 11:21:38 -0300
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:37 PM, randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> This sort facetious exaggeration does not help the discussion.  I
> posted a well-designed lab test just yesterday that demonstrated a
> strong adverse effect of an herbicide upon bee larvae.  The results of
> that test concern me greatly. There were 812,000 lbs of paraquat
> applied in Calif in 2010, as opposed to only 266,000 lbs of
> imidacloprid.


I wonder if you could confirm something about those amounts Randy.  They
come from the California pesticide use document that you posted a link to
previously I think.  Is the amount of imidacloprid only what was sprayed?
Does it include seed treatment (in 2010 I don't think that much
clothianidin had displaced imidacloprid from seed treatment).  What is the
amount of imidacloprid that was applied in Calif. by ALL methods?

Stan

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2