BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Nancy Dalrymple <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 22 Mar 2002 08:37:37 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
I agree with the below, before we can call anything organic it should not be
treated with chemicals.  I do not feel comfortable calling my honey organic
because of the apistan, but so far have not tried any other methods.  I
usually use the term "raw".

Nancy Dalrymple
[log in to unmask]

> To claim organic wouldn't the beekeeper have to avoid treating the bees
with
> any chemical and obtaining bees from a source that had not ever used
> chemicals. The progeny from chemical usage may not carry residue but their
> exisitence was determined by chemicals. Does not the wind blow chemicals
such
> as acid-rain. Can we say that the ground has never been contaminated. The
> woodenware never been reated with chemicals. Etc. Isn't it impossible to
say
> that honey can ever be produced organically . Not just what is below
> detection by todays instruments.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2