BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 8 Jan 2013 15:07:35 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>>>   If the above < formic, thymol and oxalic  > were allowed in U.S. organic and sustainable beekeeping, then there are plenty of commercial beekeepers in the U.S. that would then be considered to be organic.

Would that be possible when there probably aren't any areas in the U.S. that is chem free agriculturally?  Just because no chems are used in the beehive doesn't mean that the bees don't come in contact with agricultural chemicals when foraging.  Would not that condition negate the possibility for being organic?

Definition of ignorant:  Doesn't know but is capable of learning.

Mike in LA

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2