BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:23:55 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
??
> Re similarity to other formic treatments, MAQS are a whole different
> animal
> than Miteaway II.

 I did not know the Miteaway two were less than 50% formic until Juanse
posted. Do you know the concentration used in the MAQS Randy?

Formic as sold in the U.S. comes in a 33 gallon drum with a concentration of
85%. The beeks from Germany and Canada always said 65% was the correct
concentration. (cut with water).I never heard of using only a 50%
concentration when treating from above.

I was told some methods to improve control and also that the pads could be
reused effectively when recharged with formic.

My experience with formic is only experimental as with my former beekeeping
partner. I started hearing from the start that many Canada beeks were not
happy with the results from Miteaway two.

I told David V. the last time we met about the ways some beeks were doing to
improve the varroa control with his product and he seemed surprised they
felt it necessary to improve control.

bob

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2