BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Jul 2013 10:03:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
> Anyhow, the attendant bees or bees from the yard (can't recall) were
> thick on the US queen cages and sparse on the Primorsky cages.
>

It was the attendants in the battery box.  Sample size was 12 Russian, 12
domestic from a well known Florida breeder.  They were all over the US
stock, shunned the Russians.  I had a tough time getting the Russian queens
accepted and the colonies established.  I made up the nucs very lean
(small, fewer bees and brood than normal, left in the same yard so the
field bees returned to the original colony, leaving only young bees in the
nucs).  Set up in this manner, most of the queens were accepted, but the
nucs were so sparse that it took a long time for them to grow into
anything, and more than a few came down with chalkbrood, further
exacerbating their build up.  I will say all got over the chalkbrood, but
few reached successful over wintering proportions, and the few that made it
to the following spring amounted to anything.

It was not my first, but it was my last attempt to establish Russian hives
in my operation.

Aaron Morris - 150 hives, 40 years

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2