BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jo Maybeck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 15 Oct 2017 22:22:23 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
> Seralini's study is not discredited at all



: Only by any scientist who has closely read and analyzed it, as I did.

: myself.



Can you link or cite your paper refuting Seralini's?



: The intent to counter negative information by a corporation and the

: objections to imperfect studies finding negative information on a

: product are often linked into a complicated accusation of conspiracy.



Here, Monsanto's internal memos are the self-incrimination that they did
conspire.

Usefulness of the study may be real low, but the ethics of Monsanto in
attempting to censor were much lower.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2