> They start by trying to prove neonics "could be" 
> the source of global bee decline, and flog about from there.

Please provide support for the claim about the intent of the study's
authors.  As I said before, they clearly state "Given the changes we observe
at the RNA and lipid level...". This makes the statement a conclusion based
upon their data, not a statement of any before-the-fact "intent".

Again, I have to point out that the above sounds a lot like an attempt at an
ad hominem attack. 

Got any comments on the results?  The methods?  The suitability of the
controls? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html