BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
beekeeper <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:23:00 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Hi All,
While cleaning my bee shed this afternoon and moving a stack of queen
excluders that I have never used, I began to wonder about the evolution, so
to speak, to the bigger and better honey bee and the controversy of "to
queen exclude or not to queen exclude.  The anti-excluder group claim the
bees do not traverse the excluder and therefore do not produce as much
honey.

My question, have the spaces in queen excluders been increased ever so
slightly to accommodate the bigger, better bee?  If not, they very well
could become a deterrent to moving into honey supers simply due to size
constraints.  They obviously can move through but perhaps not as easily as
when bees were smaller.

Also, of the 6 packages I received this spring, 3 have superceded.  They
were SMR queens.  Anyone else having this problem?
Just wondering!
Coleene

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2