BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stellio Matson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 09:31:26 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
On Thu, 7/25/13, Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> With the high value of pollinating units at present,
> there is no indication that the number will fall below 2.5
> million hives. If it were to rise, on the other hand, the
> price offered to beekeepers for pollination would fall, and
> we would start back down. Obviously, these numbers are
> market driven. 

So can we say Jeff Pettis is on shaky ground to claim annual colony
losses in the 30% range are "economically unsustainable"?

http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/pr/2009/090519.htm?pf=1

Paul Cherubini
El Dorado, Calif.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2