BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Aaron Morris <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 21:11:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
This message  was originally submitted by [log in to unmask]
It was edited to remove quotes of previously posted material.

----- Original message (ID=6B0A95D2) (68 lines) -------
From: [log in to unmask] (A. Pausch via AP4U GmbH)
Subject: AW: [BEE-L] Mite fall
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 10:04:35 +0100

Hi Andy,
the answer is - it depends.

If 50 mites over 24 hours is what you find without having treated
against
varroa (natural fall out) then this is a hell of a investation. You can
propably assume that the number of mites left in the colony is abot 100
-
200 (some scientists even suggest up to  300) times of that.

If however 50 mites is the result following a varroa treatment then it
is
low when you assume that your treatment was effective (and bees not
having
brood). However if you have doubts that your treatment was not effective
(because bees still having brood, the mists being resistant aginst the
drug,
etc...) then only 50 mites would be an indication of a unsuccessfull
treatment.

Regards
Albrecht

ATOM RSS1 RSS2