BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dave Green, Eastern Pollinator Newsletter" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 10 Apr 1996 01:06:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
> John Day <[log in to unmask]> wrote.
>
>>i don't understand the need to fill up the space left as a result of
putting
>>in 9 frames instead of 10 by using a follower board.  if the concern is
>>burr comb to the sides of the hive caused by the extra space, then why not
>>use 10 frames to fill up the space?  you'd get more honey, less burr comb
>>and more brood.  Correct?
>>
>>i never did understand the 9 vs 10 frame principal..   can someone convince
>>me why it is better?
 
   Nine frames in the supers is a good idea, because a thicker comb is easier
to uncap.
 
   Nine frame in the brood chamber would be really foolish for a migratory
beekeeper.  Anytime you remove any frames, you always have to wait a few
weeks, until they are glued again, before trucking. Otherwise the loose
frames will beat the bees to death.
 
   I also agree that the tenth frame becomes very important in the spring,
when you want as much brood as possible.
 
[log in to unmask]    Dave Green,  PO Box 1200,  Hemingway,  SC  29554
 
Practical Pollination Home Page
http://users.aol.com/pollinator/polpage1.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2