BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:30:25 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>
> >While I can see elevated levels in surrounding plants,  I see no way it
> couold exceed in this case by a factor of 8,  the level that was directly
> applied.
> Can you explain how this would even be remotely possible?


I've now had a chance to correspond with the authors at length.  There is
the possibility that there may have been planting dust on the hand
collected pollen (unfortunately they didn't take foliar samples).

The other explanation is that some plants bioconcentrate the residues in
the pollen.  There have been previous reports of this.  We clearly need
more testing to determine the extent to which various pollinator-attractive
species concentrate residues.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2